Jensen Huang — 82/100 Cope Score
AI isn't going to eliminate jobs. He said that tasks are more at risk.
Every Monday we crown the week's most copium-laden article. Here's the hall of shame.
AI isn't going to eliminate jobs. He said that tasks are more at risk.
"The narrative that AI is destroying jobs is completely backwards."
"pretty sure" AI has been net job-creating so far. "This is not what I expected,"
"People think it's inevitable. 'I actually don't think that's true'" - claiming AI displacement isn't inevitable and that focusing on human empowerment could "in...
"in theory there should be more jobs in the future, not less"
"People talk about AI reducing jobs — complete nonsense"
"No sick days, No HR complaints... The bots never get frustrated with you"
"complete nonsense" — Huang's dismissal of documented AI-driven job losses
"You need to give them identities, you need to give them sandboxes, then you need to set policies to..."
"AI is unlikely to trigger the large-scale 'jobs apocalypse' many feared"
"I think the narrative that connects AI to job loss for many of the CEOs that are doing it is just too lazy."
"'AI job loss' narratives are all fake," and the industry would facilitate a "massive jobs boom" because it allows individual workers to be "endlessly...
"Don't worry about squirreling money away for retirement in 10 or 20 years... It won't matter... [AI will bring about a world of] zero...
"It is unlikely most people will lose a job to AI. It is most likely that most people will lose their job to somebody who uses AI. And so we have to make sure that everybody uses AI."